• By ADMIN
• Posted 12 May, 2019
• 3631
• 0

Safe Harbor Rules

In order to reduce the number of transfer pricing audits and prolonged disputes, a new section 92CB has been inserted to provide that the determination of arm’s length price under section 92C or section 92CA shall be subject to Safe Harbour rules

The Finance (No. 2) Act 2009 introduced the provisions in the Income Tax Law that empowered the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to issue transfer pricing Safe Harbour Rules. The CBDT on 14^th August 2013 released draft safe harbour rules for public comments. After consideration comments of various stakeholders on 18^th September 2013, the CBDT issued the final Safe Harbour Rules.

Section 92CB of the Act defines the term Safe Harbour as “circumstances under which the income-tax authorities shall accept the transfer pricing declared by the assessee.”  The Rule provides minimum operating profit margin in relation to operating expenses a taxpayer is expected to earn for certain categories of international transactions, that will acceptable to the income tax authorities as arm’s length price (ALP). The rule also provides acceptable norms for certain categories of financial transactions such as intra-group loans made or guarantees provided to non-resident affiliates of an Indian tax payers. The safe harbour rules, optional for a taxpayer, contains the conditions and circumstances under which norms / margins would be accepted by the tax authorities and the related compliance obligations.

The safe harbour rule are not arm’s length prices, but in the nature of presumptive taxation, which generally enthuse taxpayers to opt for the same, as a compromise for not having to be involved in protracted litigation. Safe harbour typically include a premium payable by taxpayers for avoiding disputes and protracted litigations. Safe harbours may broadly take two forms (a) outright exclusion by setting thresholds; or (b) simplification of provisions by designating range, within which prices/profits should fall.

Applicable Safe Harbour Transfer Price:

New rules 10TA to 10TG contains the procedure for adopting safe harbour, the transfer price to be adopted, the compliance procedures upon adoption of safe harbours and circumstances in which a safe harbor adopted may be held to be invalid. Eligible International Transactions and applicable safe harbour transfer price subject to the ceilings/circumstances stated as under: –

Note- 1: Safe harbour rates prescribed for loans advanced to Associated Enterprises.

The value of international transaction <= Rs.200 Crores and the operating profit margin to operating expense is -

Validity of Five Year/ Three Years

The transfer price contained in the safe harbour rules shall be applicable for five years beginning from financial year (FY) 2012-13 for the first time. Now, the revised rules/rates applicable for AY 2017-18 to AY 2019-20. The taxpayer has flexibility in electing the years to be governed by the safe harbor rules within the five year period. Where a taxpayer’s transfer price is accepted by the Tax Authority under the safe harbor rules, the taxpayer shall not be entitled to invoke the mutual agreement procedure (MAP) under an applicable tax treaty.

Non-applicability of SHRs

Safe harbour rules shall not apply if an AE is located in any country or territory notified under section 94A of the Act, or low tax (less than 15% tax rate) country or territory.

Filing of FORM 3CEFA

Any taxpayer who has entered into an eligible international transaction and who wishes to exercise the option to be governed by the safe harbour rules is required to file a specified form (Form 3CEFA). Form 3CEFA requires the taxpayer to declare the following:

• Transaction entered with an AE is an eligible international transaction;
• Quantum of the international transaction
• Whether the AEs country or territory is a no tax or low tax country or territory; and
• Operating profit margin/transfer price.

Procedural requirements:

To exercise their option to be governed by the Safe Harbour Rules (SHRs), the tax payer is required to file specified form (Form No.3CEFA) with the Assessing Officer (AO) on or before the due date for furnishing the return of income for: -

• The relevant assessment year, in case the option is exercised only for that assessment year; or
• The first of the assessment years, in case the option is exercised for more than assessment years.

Timeline for Tax Authorities.

The rules also provide timelines within which the tax authorities need to take action on the option exercised by the taxpayer. These are:

Benefits of Safe Harbour

Safe harbours carry certain benefits which are described below:

• Compliance Simplicity: Safe harbours tend to substitute simplified requirements in place of existing regulations, thereby reducing compliance burden and associated costs for eligible taxpayers, who would otherwise be obligated to dedicate resources and time to collect, analyze and maintain extensive data to support their inter-company transactions.

• Certainty & Reduce Litigation: Electing safe harbours may grant a greater sense of assurance to taxpayers regarding acceptability of their transfer price by the tax authorities without onerous audits. This conserves administrative and monetary resources for both the taxpayer and the tax administration.

• Administrative Simplicity: Since tax administrations would be required to carry out only a minimal examination in respect of taxpayers opting for safe harbours, they can channelize their efforts to examine more complex and high-risk transactions and taxpayers.

Challenges Faced

While safe harbours generally are beneficial, their availability is not without concerns, some of which are:

1. High Margins/Price: Some of the rates are very high and reflect neither industry benchmarks nor the current economic environment.

2. Risk of double taxation: When adopted unilaterally, safe harbours pose risk of double taxation since reporting of higher than arm’s length level of income in one jurisdiction (to comply with safe harbour levels) need not be necessarily accepted by the tax administration in the other jurisdiction.

3. Impose Burden: Safe harbour rules continue to impose the burden of maintaining transfer pricing documentation on taxpayers opting for it. Excluding taxpayers transacting with low tax or no tax countries from the ambit of safe harbour rules creates a further exception.

4. Risk of Subjectivity & Litigation: The industry at large feels that segregating IT services into software services and contract R&D services is complicated since many of the activities may be overlapping and would require a more technical analysis than envisaged in the rules.